<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How can an artist be original?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.behindthekit.com/2009/04/11/how-can-an-artist-be-original/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.behindthekit.com/2009/04/11/how-can-an-artist-be-original/</link>
	<description>A rhythmic paradigm of music, culture and progress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:19:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praise the Lord for Black Sabbath</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthekit.com/2009/04/11/how-can-an-artist-be-original/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Praise the Lord for Black Sabbath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behindthekit.com/?p=386#comment-299</guid>
		<description>[...] to which they were destined if they didn&#8217;t &#8216;make it&#8217;. Their music was true. It resonated. It resonated with millions of kids out there like myself -even years later- who also were trying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to which they were destined if they didn&#8217;t &#8216;make it&#8217;. Their music was true. It resonated. It resonated with millions of kids out there like myself -even years later- who also were trying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I give up. I&#8217;m just gonna ROCK</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthekit.com/2009/04/11/how-can-an-artist-be-original/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>I give up. I&#8217;m just gonna ROCK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 06:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behindthekit.com/?p=386#comment-278</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s right. I&#8217;m changing my ways. Oh yes, you will still get the occasional well reasoned, intellectualized, uber-brilliant post (in my own mind anyway), but I&#8217;m realizing I lag too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s right. I&#8217;m changing my ways. Oh yes, you will still get the occasional well reasoned, intellectualized, uber-brilliant post (in my own mind anyway), but I&#8217;m realizing I lag too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seen it all? Try &#8216;Pomplamoose&#8217;.</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthekit.com/2009/04/11/how-can-an-artist-be-original/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Seen it all? Try &#8216;Pomplamoose&#8217;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behindthekit.com/?p=386#comment-230</guid>
		<description>[...] surprising me. And definitely not anything exciting me or moving me. How could there be anything?  It’s all been done. And done. And done. And [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] surprising me. And definitely not anything exciting me or moving me. How could there be anything?  It’s all been done. And done. And done. And [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith vs. Art?</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthekit.com/2009/04/11/how-can-an-artist-be-original/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith vs. Art?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 06:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behindthekit.com/?p=386#comment-140</guid>
		<description>[...] chord progressions or drum tones or lyrics –they react to them. And they react to that which resonates and what resonates with people is when something rings true. When it feels like someone finally [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chord progressions or drum tones or lyrics –they react to them. And they react to that which resonates and what resonates with people is when something rings true. When it feels like someone finally [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthekit.com/2009/04/11/how-can-an-artist-be-original/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behindthekit.com/?p=386#comment-113</guid>
		<description>&quot;Originality consists of  hiding your sources&quot;... =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Originality consists of  hiding your sources&#8221;&#8230; =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jackson: The Ultimate Fallen Star</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthekit.com/2009/04/11/how-can-an-artist-be-original/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jackson: The Ultimate Fallen Star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 04:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behindthekit.com/?p=386#comment-87</guid>
		<description>[...] most comfortable in life when he is performing. I believe that is what caused such a worldwide resonance -Michael Jackson was only truly himself when he was on a stage.  And because he didn&#8217;t quite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most comfortable in life when he is performing. I believe that is what caused such a worldwide resonance -Michael Jackson was only truly himself when he was on a stage.  And because he didn&#8217;t quite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthekit.com/2009/04/11/how-can-an-artist-be-original/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behindthekit.com/?p=386#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Thanks steve. Indeed they are something to hold on to. It&#039;s like a &#039;mountain top&#039; experience can be had in the most unusual places when we least expect it. And it&#039;s those resonating experiences that give clarity and a new perspective when we enter back into the &#039;9 to 5&#039; of everyday life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks steve. Indeed they are something to hold on to. It&#8217;s like a &#8216;mountain top&#8217; experience can be had in the most unusual places when we least expect it. And it&#8217;s those resonating experiences that give clarity and a new perspective when we enter back into the &#8217;9 to 5&#8242; of everyday life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Love</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthekit.com/2009/04/11/how-can-an-artist-be-original/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behindthekit.com/?p=386#comment-38</guid>
		<description>This is excellent. I love when people can look beyond the surface of the question of whether or not there&#039;s any new artistic ground to be discovered out there. It reminded me of a poetry reading by Louise Gluck and Franz Wright that I attended a few years ago. I &lt;a href=&quot;http://stevelove.org/an-evening-with-louise-gl%C3%BCck-and-franz-wright&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wrote about it&lt;/a&gt; back then, but the poets&#039; answers to this same question (from the standpoint of poetry, of course) mirrors much of what you said here. Wright said that poetry has resonance and shows him that everyone has had similar experiences &#8212; only the techniques for describing those experiences are new. Gluck said those new descriptions can restore meaning or breathe new life into old things that have become stale. And I think knowing that there&#039;s little chance of something new out there, for me, makes those moments of resonance and restored meaning even more precious. They are something to hold on to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is excellent. I love when people can look beyond the surface of the question of whether or not there&#8217;s any new artistic ground to be discovered out there. It reminded me of a poetry reading by Louise Gluck and Franz Wright that I attended a few years ago. I <a href="http://stevelove.org/an-evening-with-louise-gl%C3%BCck-and-franz-wright" rel="nofollow">wrote about it</a> back then, but the poets&#8217; answers to this same question (from the standpoint of poetry, of course) mirrors much of what you said here. Wright said that poetry has resonance and shows him that everyone has had similar experiences &mdash; only the techniques for describing those experiences are new. Gluck said those new descriptions can restore meaning or breathe new life into old things that have become stale. And I think knowing that there&#8217;s little chance of something new out there, for me, makes those moments of resonance and restored meaning even more precious. They are something to hold on to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthekit.com/2009/04/11/how-can-an-artist-be-original/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behindthekit.com/?p=386#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Just look at Tyler Hicks! Nothing new about him but I loved his honesty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just look at Tyler Hicks! Nothing new about him but I loved his honesty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
